WA now has significant housing funding on the table. With the release of the 2026–27 WA Budget, the industry question is no longer whether government recognises the scale of the housing challenge. It clearly does.
The question now is whether funding, infrastructure, approvals and delivery agencies can be aligned quickly enough to convert intent into homes.
The Budget includes a record $4.7 billion in new housing investment, confirming housing supply as a central economic and social priority for the State. It includes major commitments to land development, enabling infrastructure, METRONET precincts, first home buyer support, social and affordable housing, regional housing, construction workforce capacity and new housing manufacturing models.
That is welcome. But for the development industry, the key issue is not simply the size of the investment. It is whether this funding can translate into serviced land, feasible projects, timely approvals and completed homes.
One of the most important distinctions in the current housing debate is the difference between planned land supply and deliverable housing supply.
Land may be identified in a strategy, zoned for urban purposes or included in a future pipeline. But unless infrastructure, servicing, environmental approvals, agency coordination and feasibility are resolved, it will not house anyone.
The Budget responds directly to part of this challenge, with more than $1.3 billion for land development and significant investment in power, water and other enabling infrastructure. The $522 million commitment to unlock residential lots in growth areas including North Ellenbrook, East Wanneroo, Ballajura, Yanchep and Byford is particularly relevant.
This is the right direction. Infrastructure is often the difference between theoretical supply and actual delivery.
The Budget also recognises that Perth needs more than greenfield land. Support for METRONET station precincts, the Keystart pre-sale guarantee, concessional finance for first home buyer apartment projects, and investment in advanced manufacturing facilities for modular housing and apartments all point to a broader housing delivery agenda.
That matters because Perth’s housing needs are changing. We continue to rely heavily on detached housing, while demand is becoming more diverse. First home buyers are older, affordability thresholds are tighter, household structures are shifting, and migration continues to reshape the market.
We need more housing choice: townhouses, terraces, apartments, build-to-rent, land lease, smaller lots and other tenure models that respond to how people actually live.
From my perspective, the next challenge is implementation.
Funding is essential, but it is not the same as delivery. The industry will be looking closely at how these commitments flow through to approval pathways, agency referral timeframes, infrastructure sequencing, land assembly, environmental assessment and project feasibility.
Good planning has a central role to play here. It should provide clarity, coordination and confidence. It should help identify where investment can unlock the greatest housing yield, where medium density can be supported by amenity and transport, and where approval processes can be proportionate without compromising good outcomes.
The Budget is an important signal. It confirms that housing delivery is now a whole-of-government priority.
But the real test will be whether we can move from a pipeline mindset to a delivery mindset.
WA’s growth story remains strong. The task now is to turn that growth, and this investment, into homes and communities that are affordable, liveable and capable of meeting the needs of the next generation.
3 min read
